New Data on Risk of Aspirin
Aspirin is used for a wide variety of indications, and an analysis of randomized trials by Rothwell and colleagues, which was published in the January 1, 2011, issue of the Lancet, found that aspirin was effective in reducing the overall risk for death from cancer. Aspirin was particularly effective in reducing the risk for death from gastrointestinal tract cancer, and longer duration of aspirin therapy was associated with greater reductions in cancer mortality risks. However, the dose of aspirin did not appear to affect this outcome.
Nonetheless, many reviews have failed to provide a balance between the risks and benefits of aspirin as primary preventive therapy. A new meta-analysis said to provide "the largest evidence to date regarding the wider effects of aspirin treatment in primary prevention" has shown that cardiovascular benefits are offset by an elevated risk of bleeding [1].
Senior author Dr Kausik Ray (St George's University of London, UK) commented: "On a routine basis I would not recommend aspirin use in primary prevention”.
The new analysis included nine randomized placebo-controlled trials with a total of 100 000 participants. Results showed that during a mean follow-up of six years, aspirin treatment reduced total cardiovascular events by 10%, driven primarily by a reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), but there was a 30% increased risk of nontrivial bleeding events. The number needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular event was 120, compared with 73 for causing a nontrivial bleed.
Effect of Aspirin on Vascular and Nonvascular Outcomes or Death (below I = benefit)
|
Event |
Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|
Cardiovascular events |
0.90 (0.85–0.96) |
|
Nonfatal MI |
0.80 (0.67–0.96) |
|
Cardiovascular death |
0.99 (0.85–1.15) |
|
Cancer mortality |
0.93 (0.84–1.03) |
|
Nontrivial bleed |
1.31 (1.14–1.50) |
Possible Benefit in Those at High Risk
The authors conclude that the "rather modest benefits" and the significant increase in risk of bleeding do not justify routine use of aspirin in the primary-prevention population. They say that further study is needed to identify subsets that may have a favorable risk/benefit ratio. They note that their results suggest an increased risk of nontrivial bleeding in individuals receiving daily (vs alternate-day) aspirin treatment and a particularly unfavorable risk/benefit ratio for individuals at lower baseline cardiovascular risk.
1. Seshasai SRK, Wijesuriya S, Sivakumaran R, et al. Effect of aspirin on vascular and nonvascular outcomes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2012; DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.628. Available at: http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/archinternmed.2011.628.
My Comments:
1. I only advise aspirin for patients at high risk for heart attack and stroke (as demostrated by high CIMT, high calcium score or previous history of MI or stroke).
2. I never use it in patients with high blood pressure as it may cause a hemorrhagic stroke.
3. I do like to use 81 mg in people with a strong family history of GI cancer.
4. I use it when there is elevated blood viscosity along with natto and phosphatidylcholine.