New Data on Risk of Aspirin

Aspirin is used for a wide variety of indications, and an analysis of randomized trials by Rothwell and colleagues, which was published in the January 1, 2011, issue of the Lancet, found that aspirin was effective in reducing the overall risk for death from cancer. Aspirin was particularly effective in reducing the risk for death from gastrointestinal tract cancer, and longer duration of aspirin therapy was associated with greater reductions in cancer mortality risks. However, the dose of aspirin did not appear to affect this outcome.

Nonetheless, many reviews have failed to provide a balance between the risks and benefits of aspirin as primary preventive therapy. A new meta-analysis said to provide "the largest evidence to date regarding the wider effects of aspirin treatment in primary prevention" has shown that cardiovascular benefits are offset by an elevated risk of bleeding [1].

Senior author Dr Kausik Ray (St George's University of London, UK) commented: "On a routine basis I would not recommend aspirin use in primary prevention”.

The new analysis included nine randomized placebo-controlled trials with a total of 100 000 participants. Results showed that during a mean follow-up of six years, aspirin treatment reduced total cardiovascular events by 10%, driven primarily by a reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), but there was a 30% increased risk of nontrivial bleeding events. The number needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular event was 120, compared with 73 for causing a nontrivial bleed.

 

Effect of Aspirin on Vascular and Nonvascular Outcomes or Death (below I = benefit)

Event

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Cardiovascular events

0.90 (0.85–0.96)

Nonfatal MI

0.80 (0.67–0.96)

Cardiovascular death

0.99 (0.85–1.15)

Cancer mortality

0.93 (0.84–1.03)

Nontrivial bleed

1.31 (1.14–1.50)

 

Possible Benefit in Those at High Risk

The authors conclude that the "rather modest benefits" and the significant increase in risk of bleeding do not justify routine use of aspirin in the primary-prevention population. They say that further study is needed to identify subsets that may have a favorable risk/benefit ratio. They note that their results suggest an increased risk of nontrivial bleeding in individuals receiving daily (vs alternate-day) aspirin treatment and a particularly unfavorable risk/benefit ratio for individuals at lower baseline cardiovascular risk.

 

1.    Seshasai SRK, Wijesuriya S, Sivakumaran R, et al. Effect of aspirin on vascular and nonvascular outcomes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2012; DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.628. Available at: http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/archinternmed.2011.628.

 

My Comments:

1.    I only advise aspirin for patients at high risk for heart attack and stroke (as demostrated by high CIMT, high calcium score or previous history of MI or stroke).

2.    I never use it in patients with high blood pressure as it may cause a hemorrhagic stroke.

3.    I do like to use 81 mg in people with a strong family history of GI cancer.

4.    I use it when there is elevated blood viscosity along with natto and phosphatidylcholine.

Statins and Risk of Getting Diabetes

 

 

Statin use in postmenopausal women is associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetes mellitus, research shows. Association does not mean causation, however. New data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hint that the risk of diabetes is higher than suggested by previous studies, with investigators reporting a 48% increased risk of diabetes among the women taking the lipid-lowering medications.

"With this study, what we're seeing is that the risk of diabetes is particularly high in elderly women, and this risk is much larger than was observed in another previous meta-analysis," senior investigator Dr Yunsheng Ma (University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston). "For doctors treating patients, we would like them to really look at the risk/benefit analysis, especially in different age groups, such as older women."

Annie Culver (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), a pharmacist and lead investigator of the study, published online January 9, 2012 in the Archives of Internal Medicine, said that "close monitoring and an individualized risk-vs-benefit assessment is really a good thing, as well as an emphasis on continued lifestyle changes." Culver added that as the population ages, and because these patients have a higher vulnerability to diabetes anyway, monitoring for diabetes in statin-treated patients becomes more important.


Previously published data on statins and diabetes risk

Recently published data highlighted the potential risk of diabetes with statin therapy. In June, Dr Kausik Ray (St George's University of London, UK) and colleagues published a meta-analysis of PROVE-ITA to Z,TNTIDEAL, and SEARCH—five trials testing high-dose statin therapy—and found a significant increase in risk of diabetes with higher doses of the lipid-lowering drugs. A meta-analysis published in the Lancet in 2010 by Dr Naveed Sattar (University of Glasgow, Scotland) also showed that statin therapy was associated with a 9% increased risk of diabetes.

In the present study, Culver, Ma, and colleagues analyzed data from the WHI, an analysis that included 153 840 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years old. Information about statin use was obtained at enrollment and year 3; the current analysis includes data until 2005. At baseline, 7.0% of women were taking statins, with 30% of women taking simvastatin, 27% taking lovastatin, 22% taking pravastatin, 12.5% taking fluvastatin, and 8% taking atorvastatin. During the study period, 10 242 incident cases of diabetes were reported.

"The association between diabetes risk and statin therapy was not observed with any one type of statin, and it seems to be a class effect," said Ma.


Significantly increased risk of diabetes was observed in white, Hispanic, and Asian women (an increased risk of 49%, 57%, and 78%, respectively). Among African Americans, who made up 8.3% of the population studied, there was a nonsignificant 18% increased diabetes risk associated with statin use at baseline. Statin use and diabetes risk was also observed in women across a range of body-mass indices (BMIs <25.0, 25.0-29.9, and >30.0 kg/m2). Women with the lowest BMI (<25.0 kg/m2), appeared to be at higher risk of diabetes compared with obese women, a finding the investigators speculate is related to phenotype or hormonal differences between the women.

In an editorial Dr Kirsten Johansen (University of California, San Francisco), editor of the Archives, noted that the increased risk of diabetes in women without CVD has "important implications for the balance of risk and benefit of statins in the setting of primary prevention, in which previous meta-analyses show no benefit on all-cause mortality."

Ma agreed, noting that statins are used with increasing frequency, including in primary prevention, and—based on the JUPITER trial—in patients with normal LDL cholesterol but elevated C-reactive protein (>2.0 mg/L). In the present study, baseline statin therapy was associated with a significant 46% and 48% increased risk of diabetes in women with CVD and without CVD, respectively.

MY COMMENTS:

In biochemistry, we learned that glucose is the precursor of cholesterol: Glucose-6-Phosphate --> Pyruvic acid --> Acetyl CoA --> Cholesterol. Since Statins block the production of cholesterol by inhibiting HGA CoA reductase, statins may help accumulate blood glucose especially if the individual continues to consume excess carbohydrates which helps produce more blood sugar. Not exercising ads to this risk. Hyperglycemia is the main cause for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus.

It takes approximately 10- 12 years to develop diabetes from elevated blood sugar. Women on statins should make every effort to lose weight, exercise and eat low glycemic foods.

I do not give statins to patients without atherosclerosis. I use carotid ultrasound (CIMT) and heart scans to determine if there is plaque. Personal and family history are also important.

By checking A1c every 3-6 months elevated sugar can be prevented and diabetes risk averted. A heart attack will kill you faster than elevated sugar.

Elevated blood sugar can be treated aggressively though diet, exercise, lipoic acid, metformin, chromium and many other means.

Statins should not just be prescribed to everyone with elevated LDL…just to those with increased cardiovascular risk.

Statin therapy, along with my comprehensive nutritional supplementation protocol, give excellent results. I prove this by showing reversal of plaque and prevention of heart attack and stroke.

 

 

 

 

The LDL Lowering Agent No One Wants to Talk About....

Tocotrienols are effective in lowering serum total and LDL-cholesterol levels by inhibiting the hepatic enzymic activity of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzymeA (HMG-CoA) reductase through the post-transcriptional mechanism. alpha-Tocopherol, however, has an opposite effect (induces) on this enzyme activity. Since tocotrienols are also converted to tocopherols in vivo, it is necessary not to exceed a certain dose, as this would be counter-productive. The present study demonstrates the effects of various doses of a tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF25) of stabilized and heated rice bran in hypercholesterolemic human subjects on serum lipid parameters. Ninety (18/group) hypercholesterolemic human subjects participated in this study, which comprised three phases of 35 days each. The subjects were initially placed on the American Heart Association (AHA) Step-1 diet and the effects noted. They were then administered 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg/day of TRF25 while on the restricted (AHA) diet. The results show that a dose of 100 mg/day of TRF25 produce maximum decreases of 20% (total cholesterol), 25% (LDL-cholesterol), 14% (apolipoprotein B)  and 12% (triglycerides), respectively, suggesting that a dose of 100 mg/day TRF25 plus AHA Step-1 diet may be the optimal dose for controlling the risk of coronary heart disease in hypercholesterolemic human subjects.

 

TRF25 works in similar way to a statin but withmuch fewer if any side effects. Also, there is no inhibition of CoQ10 synthesis. 

Atherosclerosis. 2002 Mar;161(1):199-207. Dose-dependent suppression of serum cholesterol by tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF25) of rice bran in hypercholesterolemic humans. Qureshi AASami SASalser WAKhan FA.